Recent work
View full portfolio →
A branded template your team can actually use — master slides, layout libraries, chart styles, and rules simple enough that people follow them.
From $500 · PowerPoint and/or Google Slides · master slides + layout library + usage guide
Every company that presents regularly eventually faces the same maths: ten people building decks independently, each starting from whatever file they found last, producing ten interpretations of the brand. The cost isn't only design quality — it's the hours spent rebuilding slides that should have taken minutes.
A presentation template system fixes the source. Instead of a single pretty deck, you get infrastructure: master slides that control the whole file, a library of layouts covering the situations your team actually encounters, chart and table styles already on-brand, and a short usage guide that makes the right choice the easy one.
Done properly, this is the highest-leverage presentation investment a team can make. One system, used weekly, quietly raises the floor on every deck the company produces.
Logo, colours, and type set once at the master level, so brand updates propagate instead of requiring a manual sweep.
Title, agenda, section break, data slide, comparison, timeline, team, quote, closing — the layouts people reach for, pre-built and correct.
Chart colour sequences, table styles, and icon sets defined in advance, so data slides stop being improvised.
Two pages, not forty: what to use when, what not to change, and how to add a slide without breaking the system.
We start from how your team really presents, not from a generic slide checklist.
We review your recent decks and brand guidelines to see which slide types your team genuinely needs — and which they keep improvising.
A sample set of key layouts for approval before the full library is produced.
Masters, layouts, chart styles, icon set, and a demo deck showing the system in use.
Template files plus a short usage guide, and a walkthrough so the team knows how to use it.
Most templates fail for one of three reasons. They are built as a single deck rather than as true masters, so nothing propagates. They contain forty layouts nobody can navigate, so people copy an old slide instead. Or they enforce rules that make real slides impossible — a rigid text box that can't hold the actual content someone needs to present.
We design for the messy middle: enough structure that decks stay coherent, enough flexibility that people don't route around the system. The test isn't how the template looks on delivery day — it's whether decks made six months later still look right.
For sales teams, the highest-value additions are modular case-study and pricing layouts that can be recombined per prospect. For consultancies, it's data-heavy analysis layouts and a disciplined chart language. For companies with multiple sub-brands, it's a shared skeleton with controlled colour variations, so everything reads as one family.
We've built unified multi-deck systems where several presentations had to feel like one programme — including a five-deck innovation series and a 55-slide training programme rebuilt as a reusable system.
“Anjam has very high analytic skills and he is always polite and accurate in his delivery. I have used Anjam for over 10 orders of work and he has never failed me as a customer.”✓ Verified 5-star review
Priced by library size and number of platforms.
Includes master slides, demo deck, usage guide, and a handover walkthrough.
Most teams are well served by 12–18. Beyond that, people stop navigating the library and start copying old slides — which is exactly the behaviour a system exists to prevent.
Yes. The two platforms have different capabilities, so we build each natively rather than exporting one into the other, keeping them visually consistent.
That's the point. The usage guide is deliberately short, layouts are named for situations rather than design jargon, and we can run a walkthrough session with your team on handover.
Yes — brand guidelines are the ideal starting point. Where a guideline creates problems on screen (low-contrast colour pairings are the usual culprit), we'll propose a presentation-specific adaptation rather than silently breaking the brand.
We can define a presentation-specific visual system: type scale, colour palette, chart language, and imagery direction. It won't replace a full brand identity, but it will make every deck consistent.
Typically 7–14 working days depending on library size, including the approval step on sample layouts.
Tell us how your team presents and we'll scope a template system that fits — fixed quote within hours.
